InSaNe

karte skines s neta a za mob trebas karticu negdje porinut

xenon zarulja, kad sam stavio kit pipo rukom i far je puno topliji

Oduvijek je to bio boric wunderbaum ali od kad mi je izgrizo plastiku nema sanse da vise to govno metnem u auto.

evo ga Uploaded with ImageShack.us

sto je starije to je bolje najbolja refernca su ovi sta prodaju ulje, ako oni kazu da valja pogotovo ako je s njihovog skladista moze bit i 100 g staro

patrol 3.0 ditd trosi 14litri po gradu, automatik

mrtav ladan

celicnu vunu, po mogucnosti nehrdjajucu

pd 1 nemoj nosit obleku s placa

ae usrali ste ga, sad covjek nece iz principa vratit novce jer se sere u naprijed :-)

vjerojatno je u nekom safe modu, odi tamo di si chipao auto reklamirat

moras na dijagnostiku, al ideja da kad ti se upali check engine ides auto rastezat po autoputu je vrhunska

U bauhausu, hammerit

evo tu izmedju sjedala je stanga, ne vidi ju se opce izvana, nije cak ni zasvasana kako sam mislio nego se na sarafe montira, to ti stvarno nije problem dat nekom za napravit funkcionira bez greske

odes na cetke i uzmes podno pranje

ne zajebavam, budem ti sutra slikao

kako ne, samo zavaris celicnu sipku izmedju gornjeg i donjeg dijela sica i eto ti isofixa ima kod mene tako slozeno

frendu se ista stvar na golfu desila, razletila se turbina

nasipaj piljevine u getribu i prodaj

I ocekivao sam da cu morat objasnit. U ovom slucaju se ne radi o statistickom uzorku jer su dostupni svi podaci o registriranim autima dakle time i svi podaci o autu pa tako i jeli opremljen ili ne abs-om kao i koji su auti sudjelovali u nesrecama plus hrpa drugih detalja. (vani cak i privatne osobe mogu dobiti povijest bolesti svakog auta bez potrebe za vezama u muriji kao kod nas) E sad sto se tice statistike. Ljudima koji su radili te statisticke analize je jasno da ima vise auta s abs-om i da se nemoze prosto seljacki gledat samo broj nesreca pa tako rec da je zbog toga bilo vise nezgoda kod auta s abs-om kao sto je dr. Watson konstatirao. Statisticari su ipak postotak izracunali u odnosu na broj registriranih vozila. Dakle recimo da je u US registrirano 10.586.158 vozila s abs-om i 895.058 vozila bez abs-a. Vozila s abs-om su sudjelavala u 586.186 nesreca, a vozila bez abs-a u 19.987 nesreca. Koja vozila imaju vecu vjerojatnost za sudjelovanje u nesreci? Dr. Watson bi zakljucio da je 586.186 vise nego 19.987, ali je to zapravo zabluda jer vozila s abs-om ima par milijona vise pa su statisticari bubnuli bezveze. Sherlock bi to ipak preracunao u postotak i zakljucio da je: 586.186/10.586.158 = 5.5% 19.987/895.058 = 2.2% Da se razumijemo ja ne tvrdim da je abs opasan nego sam prenio clanak koji se tice teme jer mi se ucinio zanimljivim za diskusiju (ne diskusiju o statistici). Cinjenica je da u nekim situacijama abs produzuje zaustavni put jer mu osnovna namjena niti nije da smanji zaustavni put nego da sprijeci blokiranje kotaca pri kocenju.

Dragi Watson nije ucio statistiku u skoli niti cuo za postotke. :doh: Rezultati su iskazani u postocima, dakle svejedno je koliko ima auta sa ili bez abs-a. Ako treba reci pa da objasnim kaj to znaci. :rofl:

S abs-om se ni ne treba nac u rizicnoj situaciji, on sam pokusava atentat n9QXo2pcfuo o zivotu i smrti odlucuju kondenzatori iz kine koji se igraju s kocnicama

Ja isto kazem da to treba pravilno istestirat i provjerit :rofl: Obzirom da je autoindustrija u banani poceli su na sve aute metat abs da ih se sto vise podrobi

Is the Antilock Brake System Really Effective in Avoiding Vehicle Crashes? by Bernadette Dalao May 10, 2008 The antilock brake system (ABS) was introduced by car manufacturers in the 1980s. Immediately, it was hailed as a major safety feature because of its ability to help drivers avoid crashes that result from skidding on wet roads. Today, the brakes are standard equipment on most new vehicles - but at a cost of over $1,000. Which leads you to ask if you are getting your money's worth. Maybe not. Antilock brakes are activated when the system senses that one or more wheels are about to lock up - usually, as you apply firm and continuous pressure to the brake pedal. If your car has ABS, you should not pump your brakes when stopping suddenly. Pumping antilock brakes is a dangerous proposition because it deactivates the very technology you want to engage. Unlike regular braking systems, antilock brakes will not lock up the wheels or cause the car to skid out of control when you slam on them. That's because the system reduces brake pressure and pumps the brakes automatically (up to 15 times a second) until the wheels rotate correctly. This maximizes road grip, prevents skidding, enables you to steer while braking, and may allow you to stop more quickly. But do antilock brakes really reduce crashes? Although antilock brakes continue to work very effectively on the test track, they've produced mixed results on the road. U.S. government and insurance-industry studies found that they don't significantly reduce crashes. Even more alarming are two surveys that concluded that cars with ABS are more likely to be involved in fatal single-vehicle crashes. Auto-industry studies, on the other hand, showed that ABS reduced accidents on wet roads by up to 19 percent - and that they prevented nonfatal crashes but not fatal ones. The bottom line is: ABS makes little difference on dry roads and will actually lengthen stopping distances on gravel or soft snow. It is, however, effective in wet conditions. One final caution: Despite their safety benefits, experts say that antilock brakes don't enable you to drive more aggressively or negotiate curves faster. Nor do they shorten the recommended distance you should maintain between your car and the one in front of you.

Killer ABS By Frank Williams The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) has a mission: “Save lives, prevent injuries, reduce vehicle-related crashes.” NHTSA also commits itself to “providing the most accurate and complete information available to its customers, the American traveling public.” While NHTSA’s progress towards its stated goals is (and always will be) a matter of debate, the agency has failed us. They’ve failed to tell the truth about ABS. Modern ABS consists of a computer (CPU), four speed sensors (one on each wheel) and hydraulic valves (attached to the brake circuit). When the CPU senses that one or more of the wheels are turning significantly more slowly than the others, it decreases the pressure on the braking circuit. If the wheel or wheels then turn too fast (freed from braking), the force is reapplied, creating a pulsing sensation through the brake pedal. When Bosch’s Antiblockiersystem appeared on the US automotive scene in the late ‘70’s, safety advocates hailed electronically assisted braking as a life-saving technology that would reduce the number and severity of accidents. Tests under controlled conditions seemed to support the contention. NHTSA and the insurance industry quickly embraced and promoted the technology. Thanks (in part) to insurance industry discounts, almost every passenger vehicle now sold in America is fitted with ABS. NHTSA’s web site proclaims “…an antilock brake system (ABS) is a safe and effective braking system. ABS allows the driver to maintain directional stability, control over steering, and in some situations, to reduce stopping distances during emergency braking situation, particularly on wet and slippery road surfaces.” The real-world evidence doesn’t support their claims. Researchers have compared accident and fatality rates for vehicles with and without ABS. Other studies have examined the driving records of ABS and non-ABS equipped taxi drivers in Munich and Oslo. The accident and fatality data shows that ABS exacerbates the severity of accidents in certain situations. The taxi study proved that drivers tend to take greater risks in cars equipped with ABS (although the difference in collision rates was not significant). In short, ABS may do more harm than good. More specifically, the studies show that ABS has no real-world effect on dry-surface braking, ABS-equipped vehicles take longer to stop on ice than non-ABS vehicles, ABS-equipped vehicles are more prone to roll-over accidents than non-ABS vehicles, ABS-equipped vehicles are involved more often in single car fatal accidents than non-ABS vehicles, and drivers of ABS-equipped vehicles tend to drive faster and apply their brakes later than non-ABS drivers. The AAA Foundation for Traffic safety has determined that improper driver steering in an ABS-equipped vehicle can send it veering out of control. In their tests, jerking the wheel (as if trying to steer around an obstacle) in a 35 mph panic stop sent ABS-equipped cars careening across two lane widths. (Without the ABS, the car skidded in a straight line.) This behavior may account for the higher roll-over rates for ABS-equipped vehicles. Other research revealed that many drivers don’t use ABS properly; they pump the pedal as they would regular brakes. NHTSA, the insurance industry, manufacturers and engineers are all well aware of ABS’ shortcomings. In 1994, Dr. Charles J. Kahane published a paper for NHTSA entitled “Preliminary Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Antilock Brake Systems for Passenger Cars." Kahane reported that “All types of run-off-road crashes – rollovers, side impacts with fixed objects and frontal impacts with fixed objects – increased significantly with ABS. Nonfatal run-off-road crashes increased by an estimated 19 percent, and fatal crashes by 28 percent.” Kahane also concluded that “Rollovers and side impacts with fixed objects… had the highest increases with ABS. Nonfatal crashes increased by 28 percent, and fatal crashes by 40 percent.” In 1996, the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety published a news release titled “Antilock Brakes Don’t Reduce Fatal Crashes; People in Cars With Antilocks at Greater Risks” In 1998, Leonard Evans of General Motors’ Global R&D Operations checked NHTSA’s ABS crash data and concluded “it is unlikely that on dry roads ABS can materially reduce risk” and, more shockingly, “ABS is associated with a 44% increase in rollover risk.” In 1999, the Society of Automotive Engineers reported that “ABS was found to be associated with a 51 percent increase in fatal rollover crashes on dry roads. For fatal side impact crashes, ABS produced a 69 percent increase for unfavorable road conditions, and a 61 percent increase for favorable road conditions.” The average cost of an ABS system is $240. Multiply that figure by millions of vehicles, add the number of lives lost and the injuries suffered because of ABS' ill effects, and the true cost of this potentially lethal braking systems is evident. At the very least, NHSTA should launch an immediate investigation into the advisability of fitting SUV’s with ABS. Meanwhile, you’ve been warned: ABS can kill.